A LOT of states (and DC!) hit their by-mail voter registration postmark deadlines at the end of today. Is yours one of them? If you still need to register, meet us over at vote.org/register-to-vote now!
Also: early voting begins today in Maine, Montana, Nebraska, and New Mexico!
But seriously, Pennsylvania. Why do you need absentee ballots delivered the week BEFORE the election? No one else does!
Voters, be sure to send those ballots in by this Friday!
Still need to register to vote? Now’s the time!
Mail in your registration TOMORROW if you live in Alaska, Mississippi, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Utah (by-mail, Utahans can still register in person until Monday, October 27, 2014).
Don’t miss out! Visit Long Distance Voter and mail your voter registration application.
Pennsylvanians: It’s a big day for us!
Obviously, the Primary is today. So find your polling place and get there before 8pm!
But did you also know, today’s the day Judge Jones will release his decision on Pennsylvania’s marriage equality case (Whitewood v. Wolf)? Big news coming out after 2pm. Stay tuned. (While you vote.)
UPDATE: Marriage Equality is a-go! Read the decision.
Happy Election Day Eve everyone!
Just a reminder for all PA residents (of which I am one) that, despite the state’s controversial, $1 million, tax-dollar-funded, you can still vote in Pennsylvania even if you don’t “have it” to “show it.”* (Your ID, that is.)
So vote safe tomorrow, and don’t let a pollworker turn you away from not bringing your ID!
The Department of State has relaunched its controversial advertising campaign to educate voters about the yet-to-be-implemented voter ID law. Opponents of the law called on Secretary of State Carol Aichele to pull the “misleading” ads.
NY and (some of) PA extend absentee deadlines!
Check it out, Pennsylvania absentee voters: Gov. Corbett has extended the deadline to return your absentee ballot to Monday, November 5 (received by Monday, that is), but only in counties affected by Hurricane.
Via the Post-Gazette:
Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett has extended the deadline for county election offices to receive absentee ballots to Monday, but only in those counties were election offices shut down because of Hurricane Sandy and its remnants.
The extension, which allows ballots to be delivered up until 5 p.m. the night before the general election, also applies to any county whose election office cut its hours because of the storm.
…
In Allegheny County, the deadline for absentee ballots was extended to Tuesday at 8 p.m. by a court decision earlier this week.
Absentee ballots may be mailed or delivered in person.
Even better news for New Yorkers!
In an emergency meeting late Wednesday, the board voted to ease the original Oct. 30 deadline statewide for faxed or mailed applications, according to a news release. Voters may apply for an absentee ballot in person at local boards of elections through Nov. 5. The board also extended the deadline to submit the ballots in person by six days, from Nov. 13 to Nov. 19. Ballots returned by mail still must be postmarked by Monday, Nov. 5, but have until Nov. 19 to reach the local board.
Oy, Pennsylvania! They have the earliest absentee ballot deadline in the nation. Why? Who knows?! But it’s tomorrow, so, if you are voting absentee in PA, STOP WHATEVER YOU ARE DOING AND SEND YOUR BALLOT IN IMMEDIATELY!
PS: We were so confused by the conflicting information here and here that we had to call PA and confirm. Yes, regular civilian absentee ballots MUST BE RECEIVED tomorrow (Nov 2) to count. Only overseas and military ballots will be counted if they are received on election day.
PENNSYLVANIAAAAAAAAAA!!!
How are all our East Coasters doing?! Please let us know!
PENNSYLVANIA VOTERS! Your governor has EXTENDED your absentee ballot deadline from tonight at 5PM to up to two days from now, due to Hurricane Sandy.
Pennsylvania can’t force you to show ID, but at least they can still be jerks about it.
There’s still some confusion about what’s going on with PA’s new photo ID law. I want to clear up as much confusion as I can, because I’m worried about what I’m reading on the official Pennsylvania site. “Voters will be asked, but not required, to show an acceptable photo ID on Election Day.”
Really? That’s all it says. It does not say that voters will be told that they are being asked unnecessarily and will be informed that they can still vote a normal ballot without showing photo ID.
I just want to be clear, Pennsylvania. You can still vote, whether or not you provide photo ID. A pollworker can ask you for ID (for no reason), but they can’t stop you from voting because you don’t provide it.
In other words, Pennsylvania can’t force you to provide photo ID at the polls, but at least they can still be total dicks.
For more, I turn to Stephen Colbert:
The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive
I feel like all I’m doing these days is slapping my home state on the wrist, but dang if it doesn’t deserve it.
This article from the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center about the rampant miscommunication between PennDOT and the DOS is pretty discouraging:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is still falling short in its implementation of a requirement in the state’s strict new Voter ID Law that a photo ID be made available free of charge to voters who need one to cast a ballot.
…
Basic signage and information about the law are still not available at every PennDOT licensing center, although coverage has improved considerably since July.
While PennDOT centers had virtually no information about the DOS ID, there are multiple documents that reiterate strict documentation requirements for a photo ID, which can only serve to confuse less-informed voters.
Oy.
Wacky fun with PA’s voter lookup tool!
Not really. Just a little FYI for PA voters out there.
Lots of states have tools to help you verify your voter registration online. Pennsylvania, which happens to be my current home, has one. I’ve used it, and both myself and my wife show up, verified and ready to vote.
But I just got an email from a friend telling me she and her husband are both not found on PA’s voter lookup. Odd, considering they’ve lived here longer than we have, and have definitely successfully voted here. She called her county elections office, and they verified that both she and her husband are registered. The county also told her that they’d been receiving a lot of calls from people unable to find themselves on the online site.
She emailed RA-Sure_Helpdesk@pa.gov and they were very responsive, which is refreshing. Turns out, her and her husband’s last names are hyphenated – Robosplosionstein-Smith (I’ve changed the names to protect the innocent) – but not on the voting records; they are on record as “Robosplosionstein Smith” [no hyphen].
PA’s voter ID law requires that your ID’s name “substantially conform” to the name on the voter rolls. The spirit of the law surely accepts hyphen/no-hyphen discrepancies, and my friends are unlikely to have a problem voting, but it’s ultimately up to their precinct to make that call, which is a little worrisome.
The takeaway from this is two-fold, I guess: 1) look yourself up to verify your registration! If you don’t see yourself, contact your local elections office to confirm because those tools are not as smart as you think! And, 2) NEVER CHANGE YOUR NAME!
And I’m out.
You know what is really not awesome? Voter suppression.
You know what IS really awesome? This very articulate PBS Frontline article detailing all of the ways voter suppression is alive and well in the three very competitive states of Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio. A really nifty all-you-need-to-know regarding the sneaky ways officials are trying to take the power out from the hands of voters. Pass it along!
The State of Pennsylvania v Voting: Why ID Laws Matter
NOTE: The following is a work-in-progress opinion piece. Enjoy.
I. PA’s New Law
The pollworkers for the Pennsylvania primary this year asked everyone in line if they had photo ID—not because we needed it for that election, but because they wanted to make sure people were ready for November, when PA’s new and very strict voter ID law goes into effect. Setting aside how I feel about the upcoming law, I thought this was a thoughtful preparedness measure. I live in a middle-class Philadelphia neighborhood. I hope pollworkers took the same care in the many low-income areas of Philly.
For whatever reason, voter ID is hot right now. At least 38 states chose 2011 and 2012 to crack down on an imagined problem—that individual voters are, or could be, engaging in rampant election fraud—even though there is literally a negative amount of evidence to support it.
Pennsylvania’s new law, which is currently facing legal challenge, would become one of the nation’s strictest. It requires voters to provide an acceptable form of photo ID; the prescribed “acceptable” list is short and rigid.
Many will say (have said), So what? Big deal. Any legally eligible person can get a government-issued photo ID. People should have to verify who they are before casting a vote, and the minor inconvenience of getting a photo ID outweighs the potential threat of fraudulent voting.
I agree completely that every voter should have to verify their identity. No one disagrees with that. What I reject are the notions that A) current ID laws are too weak, and, more strongly, B) getting a government-issued photo ID is easy (or even possible) for everyone. Maybe it was easy for you. That’s great! It doesn’t follow from your experience, however, that it will be easy for every person. I know this is true because last year, for the first time ever, it was not at all easy for me.
It’s important to clarify that I am in every way the product of privilege and opportunity. I am white; I am male; I never went hungry growing up. I didn’t earn any of this and yet I’ve benefited heavily from all of it. In virtue of my whiteness, maleness, and parents’ income, I don’t need to work hard or be famous to succeed at most things. It’s completely unfair, but if you don’t think it’s true, you’re definitely at least one of those things yourself.
And now: the story of how even a person born with every opportunity and advantage can have one hell of a time getting a photo ID card.
II. PennDOT v Personal Identity
My legal name, since birth and until a year ago, was Carl Gavin Tewksbury Snodgrass. (My parents have equally ridiculous last names; why would they choose one?) The name is not only fun to say, it’s also very long. Too long, it turned out, to fit on my Oregon driver’s license when I was 18. So I made a choice. I was to be Carl Gavin Snodgrass for the Oregon DMV. Everywhere else I was still officially a Tewksbury Snodgrass. I ran into some resistance once when I renewed my passport, but I eventually convinced the US government that I was in fact both Carl Gavin Snodgrass AND Carl Gavin Tewksbury Snodgrass. Other than that, I have lived this double-life—filing taxes and filling out W-4s as “Tewksburysnodgra” and getting driver’s licenses and passports in Oregon, New York, and Montana as “Snodgrass”—without incident.
…Until I came to Philadelphia. I went to PennDOT (PA’s DMV) to get my driver’s license. Just looking at the application form, I could tell it was going to be unusually difficult. You have to provide ALL of the following to get an ID:
- Your Social Security card
- Either a certificate of citizenship/naturalization, a birth certificate (with a raised seal), or a passport.
- TWO proofs of residency that must be from one of these categories: current utility bills (cell phone bills are not acceptable), lease agreements, W-2 forms, current weapons permits, or mortgage payments documents.
Basically, you will not get a PennDOT ID if you’re unemployed and don’t have a utility bill in your own name or own a house, or you don’t have a passport or access to your birth certificate, or you don’t have a Social Security card (the number alone is not acceptable, it must be the card).
I could obtain all these documents because I have lots of support and easy access to my personal records. I arrived at PennDOT midday on a Tuesday and waited about 4 hours to have my number called. Everything went smoothly with the clerk at the window until it was time to verify my mountains of proof of identity against the records at Social Security. The clerk was very nice and understood that since I provided a passport, a MT Driver’s license, two utility bills, a birth certificate AND a Social Security card, I was probably who I claimed to be, even if two of the items had one extra last name on them. His computer was less understanding. He could not go to the next frame because the computer could not verify that Carl Gavin Tewksbury Snodgrass was also Carl Gavin Snodgrass. A manager came over but, even though he too understood the situation and found it confusing that the computer did not, there was nothing he could do; there is no overriding a PennDOT computer screen. I would have to solve the issue with Social Security.
I went the to the Social Security office the next day and met with yet another very nice clerk who saw that the US government believed that I was the same person even if PennDOT did not, and wrote an official letter of verification, which he stamped and sealed. I took this letter back to PennDOT but it was no use. The computer just didn’t care. I went back to Social Security. After another round of backs and forths, I finally accepted that in order to get a PA driver’s license I would have to legally change my name. I took whatever oath and dance they make you do at Social Security and legally became Carl Gavin Snodgrass. Social Security changed my name within 24 hours but I had to wait for my new Social Security card to arrive in the mail before I could complete the PennDOT process.
All told, this process took nearly a month. It was exhausting and time-consuming (every trip to PennDOT or Social Security required hours of sitting and waiting), and it wasn’t quite over. When I finally got to the end of the line at PennDOT, reviewed my photo, and went to sign the electronic signature that would appear on my license, the woman overseeing the signage asked me, “How do you spell your name?” I spelled it for her. She looked at my signature and shook her head. According to her, signatures have to be legible for NSA security reasons. My signature, which I’ve used since I was 15, is perhaps a little doctor-y but it’s my signature. It’s on everything, including my passport. I doubt very much that NSA actually requires legible signatures. But I was tired, happy to be done with it all, and in no mood to argue. So I signed a more readable perversion of my chicken scratch.
Unfortunately I also registered to vote at the same time. I didn’t realize, though I should have, that my bizzaro driver’s license signature would be the one used by elections officials to check against my in-person signature. I did a double-take at my “official signature” when I signed my name at the polls, because it absolutely did not look like my handwriting. Luckily (for me) no pollworker yet has taken the time to inspect one signature against the other.
III. Why This Matters
The point of this is not that the state of Pennsylvania chewed two name- and signature-sized holes in my identity. Rather, the point is this. I have the advantage/privilege trifecta: I am an over-educated white male—something as unfair as it is true. On top of that, I was able to provide the unbelievably strict laundry list of documents required by PennDOT to get my ID. And still it took a month, a legal name-change, heaps of paperwork, and hours/days/weeks of headache. I had the time to get it all done because I was temporarily out of work and had no children or other major responsibilities. Again, lucky me! It’s not hard to imagine hundreds of scenarios that would have made this process a lot longer if not impossible.
PennDOT has kindly offered to provide free voter ID cards to those who cannot afford to pay for regular photo IDs. But the required documents to obtain the voter ID are the same as those to get a driver’s license. To be clear: in order to get a “free” voter ID card from PennDOT you need to be able to provide a physical copy of your Social Security card AND either a passport, official birth certificate, or certificate of naturalization AND two (narrowly-defined) proofs of residency.
This matters because all of those documents also require substantial ID verification, and most will cost money. The process can get circular and expensive; and the fewer resources and advantages you have, the more costly and circular the process gets.
This matters because even if you have all your documents in order, as I did, you may still have weeks of struggle to get your ID, as I did, or you may never be able to get it. In terms of registering and voting, a month is not trivial. There are strict deadlines (for PA, you must register 30 days before the election).
This matters because an estimated 11% of eligible voters don’t have government-issued IDs. Not surprisingly, the numbers are far higher for seniors, minorities, and low-income voters—you know, the people who have the most trouble getting their voices heard. 11% is a landslide victory in an election.
Finally, this matters because voting is not a privilege. It’s a right. That’s not a matter of opinion. The US Constitution is unambiguous about it. The 15th Amendment straight-up calls it “the right of citizens of the United States to vote.” This distinguishes it from activities like driving a car, which are privileges; they are things you earn by learning, taking a test, etc. Once you become 18 and a citizen (felony disenfranchisement laws notwithstanding), you get to vote. Yes, you have to register*, but registering to vote is your right. Impediments to that right, especially ones that disproportionately affect certain groups, should be ruled unconstitutional.
Voting and voter registration laws are deeply flawed and in desperate need of a modern makeover. No doubt about it. But new voter ID laws like Pennsylvania’s will be costly to taxpayers, may disenfranchise at least 750,000 registered Pennsylvanians—including nearly half of the city of Philadelphia—and target a problem that does not exist. With the immense burden offices like PennDOT put on getting an ID, and the total lack of evidence of voter impersonation, new laws should focus on improving access, not tightening restrictions.
___________________
*Unless you’re in North Dakota.